Skip to main content
LogoLogoEx-Magazine
  • Article
  • Expertise

Conformity assessment in the USA

Thorsten Arnhold, Wolfgang Berner

Conformity assessment in the USA

Author: Thorsten Arnhold, Wolfgang Berner
Image 1: Control panel in conduit technique for hazardous areas

A few years ago, that title would almost certainly have been "Conformity assessment in North America". However, since Canada has gradually adapted its national regulations since then to match IEC/IECEx practice, the following information refers only to conformity assessment in the USA.

In contrast to the international IEC/IECEx community and the European Union, the conformity assessment landscape in the USA is very heterogeneous, both generally and for explosion protection in particular. From the governmental side, three authorities are responsible for the safety standards for hazardous areas:

  • OSHA – Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Industrial plants on the mainland
  • MSHA – Mine Safety and Health Administration: Mining facilities
  • US Coastguard: Offshore facilities in the coastal waters of the USA

Only the US Coastguard permits the direct use of products with an IECEx certificate in hazardous areas of offshore facilities as one possible procedure.

To simplify the explanation of this very complex topic, this section will only discuss the areas regulated by OSHA; the methods used by MSHA and the US Coastguard are very similar to those used by OSHA.

 

OSHA is an agency within the United States Department of Labor. Its activity focuses on safety in the workplace. Part of its work involves establishing mandatory rules; it is also responsible for education, training, and public relations on the topic of occupational safety (1).

The US Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) makes employers responsible for providing their employees with a safe workplace that is also free from anything that could damage their health, including in the long term. As well as complying with this general clause within the Act, employers must also comply with all relevant OSHA standards.

As documents issued by the government, these OSHA standards are, to a certain extent, comparable to European directives, although the objective and level of detail of the technical requirements differ significantly. For instance, no relatively abstract framework requirements regarding safety, such as those in Appendix II of ATEX 2014/34/EU, are established. Instead, workplace-specific technical requirements are set out and must always be complied with. Additionally, OSHA standards do not deal with commissioning (providing) equipment; the OSHA standards apply to the employer, who is obligated to demand that their suppliers comply with the requirements in the standards. The following OSHA standards apply specifically to equipment that is intended for use in hazardous areas:

  • 29 CFR Part 1910 Subpart O "Machinery and Machine Guarding" (2)
  • 29 CFR Part 1910 Subpart S "Electrical" (3)

These standards recommend, with respect to general electrical safety or to electrical equipment and its wiring in hazardous areas for instance, that the devices and machines installed and operated in this area are tested and listed by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL). The Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) programme means that commercial organisations can be recognised and qualified to perform testing and certification processes for specific products as an independent third party. Each NRTL is accredited by OSHA with respect to specific standards for product safety tests. Currently, 20 NRTLs have been certified by OSHA (4). In principle, the legislator does not stipulate which NRTL must approve a specific product. Officially, all NRTLs are of equal importance when it comes to workplace safety in the USA. However, the test body Underwriter Laboratories (UL) also plays a significant role thanks to its high degree of international recognition and general reputation.

Image 2: Conduit Installation for hazardous areas

"UL-certified" is frequently used colloquially as a synonym for the testing and certification processes performed by an OSHA-accredited body. In the past, the phrase "PTB-certified" had similarly valuable connotations in Germany. In addition, UL (like Factory Manual, FM) itself also issues product standards, which all NRTLs must use as a basis for their assessments.

After a product has passed the testing and certification processes performed by an NRTL, the respective manufacturer is authorised to mark the product with the registered logo of the testing and certification body. Alongside the logo, a list of the standards that the product complies with is also provided.

For an external onlooker, trying to get to grips with the sheer number of additional regulatory organisations in the USA is always disorienting. The hierarchies and links between the different standards are also tricky to grasp. The set of rules that establish the safety of technical products, such as machines or electrical equipment, can be seen as a combination of national laws, fire codes, electrical guidelines and product standards.

As well as OSHA, a number of state-level and private organisations are responsible for maintaining and issuing a range of documents:

  • National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
  • American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
  • American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
  • Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
  • Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
  • International Society of Automation (ISA)
  • Underwriters Laboratories (UL)

The most well-known regulatory document in the electrical safety sector is ANSI/NFPA 70® – National Electrical Code (NEC) (27). This has been issued by the National Fire Protection Association since 1911 and is revised every three years. Essentially, the NEC handles the general underlying principles and regulations regarding the safety of people and systems, including:

  • Protection against electric shock
  • Protection against thermal influences
  • Protection against overcurrents and overvoltages
  • Protection against residual currents
  • Mechanical safety

Chapter 5, which deals with the topic of "special occupancies", is particularly important for explosion protection.

Article 500 contains a general description of the regulations that must be complied with in hazardous areas; it also sets out the process of categorising areas into classes and divisions:

  • Class I: Areas in which combustible gases, vapours and mists consisting of combustible liquids may be present in dangerous quantities
  • Class II: Areas in which combustible dusts may be present in dangerous quantities
  • Class III: Areas in which easily ignitable fibres may be present in dangerous quantities

In turn, these classes are each divided into two divisions, depending on the likelihood of dangerous quantities of the aforementioned combustible substance being present(similar to the three zones in the IEC classification):

  • Division 1: Constant to occasional presence of a hazardous explosive atmosphere (i.e. combines Zones 0 and 1 into a single category)
  • Division 2: Rare, brief presence of a hazardous explosive atmosphere due to rare faults in the system
Image X: Comparison of zones according to IEC and divisions according to NEC, including the probability limits used in some countries (MIC) ratio.

Article 500 also contains a classification system for the different combustible substances.

For instance, Group A refers to acetylene. The combustible substances in Groups B, C and D include gases and vapours; they differ according to their minimum ignition energy, expressed using the minimum gap width and the minimum ignition current (MIC) ratio.

Combustible dusts are categorised in Groups E, F and G. Combustible metallic substances belong in Group E, coal dusts in Group F, and other combustible dusts in Group G.

Finally, Article 500 also outlines potential types of protection for Divisions 1 and 2; it also sets out some general requirements for devices, such as classification of surface temperatures.

Articles 501 to 504 cover the specifications for installation methods in Class I to Class III. Article 504 sets out the requirements for intrinsically safe systems. Articles 505 and 506 explain how IEC zone classification can be used for systems in the USA. Article 510 contains specifications for special operations, such as garages, repair workshops, aircraft hangars, and more.

The individual requirements established by the NEC are set out in more detail using the standards listed here. The organisations listed above are responsible for creating these standards.

Alongisde ANSI/NFPA 70 NEC, ANSI/NFPA 79 Electrical Standard for Industrial Machinery is also very important for machinery and equipment manufacturers in particular.

The beginning of this section referred to the extreme heterogeneity of the conformity assessment landscape in the USA; this is partly due to the number of different regulatory organisations involved, and partly dependent on the monitoring practices that apply in each state, district and community within the country. Compliance with the range of applicable standards and regulations is the responsibility of the "Authorities Having Jurisdiction" (AHJs). Depending on the regulation that has priority locally, these may include:

  • State Electrical Commission
  • State Fire Marshal
  • Department of Public Safety

A machine or system may only be commissioned if it has been granted an operating licence by an AHJ of this kind. The fact that these decisions are not made in an equivalent way across the USA is purely because different US states refer to different issues of the NEC.


References

[1] www.osha.gov

[2] www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910

[3] www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910

[4] www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/nrtllist.html

[5] Early, Mark W. et al; National Electric Code | 2019 | Quincy Massachusetts, NFPA

One question please

One question please

Message

More Article

Created by Rico Schulz | 11/10/2022

Emergency lighting

Central battery systems as emergency lighting systems offer secure protection in the event of a power supply failure

more
Created by Joachim Sommer (BG RCI Heidelberg) | 11/04/2022

Sensing nonsense: When appearances are deceptive

Process engineering systems are generally controlled by measuring process variables such as temperature, pressure, quantity, fill level or…

more
Created by Johanna Gerlach, Alexander Riedel, Frank Engelmann | 11/02/2022

Digital support for visual inspections using deep learning

The use of deep learning models offers huge potential for reducing the error rate in visual inspections. Smart object recognition enables…

more
Created by Manfred Kienlein (DEHN SE) | 11/02/2022

Lightning and surge protection in intrinsically safe measuring…

According to Directive 1999/92/EC [1], the user or employer are obliged to assess the explosion hazard posed by their system and they must…

more
Created by Ursula Aich, Frank Lienesch, Dirk Wenner, Frank Engelmann, Thorsten Arnhold | 07/07/2022

Ex assemblies, Part 1

The discussion about Ex assemblies is as old as the EU ATEX Directive, and now dates back almost 20 years

more
Created by R. STAHL TRANBERG | 05/19/2022

How R. STAHL TRANBERG is Meeting the Digitalization Demands of…

Digitalization and the integration of data and solutions is playing a pivotal role in the shipping and maritime industries today, having a…

more
Created by Tim Krause; Jia Wu; Lisa Ostermann; Harun Kanbur: Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB) | 05/19/2022

The "PTB Ex proficiency testing scheme"

The "PTB Ex proficiency testing scheme" (PTB Ex PTS) is a project that involves developing interlaboratory comparison programmes to assess…

more
Created by Herbst, S.; Gerlach, J.; Engelmann, F.: Ernst-Abbe-Hochschule, Jena | 05/05/2022

Non-electrical explosion protection

Manufacturers and users must acquire knowledge on the subject of non-electrical explosion protection, in order to assess the application,…

more
Created by Tony Mouton (Markscheme Manager), MASC Markscheme And Training (Pty), Centurion, South Africa | 04/21/2022

Certification in South Africa

Certification in South Africa has certain key differences from international certification, e.g. IECEx or ATEX

more
Created by Thorsten Arnhold | 04/03/2022

Global conformity assessment using the IECEx system

[Translate to Englisch:]

IEC Technical Committee (TC) 31, tasked with developing a global conformity assessment system for explosion-protected products

more
Created by Claire Marchand | 04/03/2022

A mine of experience in industry

[Translate to Englisch:]

He takes over from Thorsten Arnhold, who chaired the System for the past six years

more
Created by Thorsten Arnhold, Wolfgang Berner | 03/10/2022

Conformity assessment in the USA

In contrast to the international IEC/IECEx community and the European Union, the conformity assessment landscape in the USA is very…

more
Created by J.M. McIntyre und B.J. Zimmermann | 02/17/2022

25 Years of the Zone System in the USA

In the area of explosion protection, the publication of Article 505 in the 1996 National Electrical Code (NEC®) was seen as a giant step…

more
Created by Thorsten Arnhold | 01/24/2022

An Ex-citing future with hydrogen

[Translate to Englisch:]

Aside from a few exceptions based on the effect of gravitation and radioactivity, hydrogen is the source of most primary energy that makes…

more
Created by Otto Walch | 11/27/2021

Certification of Ex products

Since 1st October 2019, new CCC certification rules have been in place for Ex products sold in China

more
Created by Nadja Schmiedl, Ingo Emde, Marco Suleder | 11/27/2021

LNG - The key energy source in the medium-term on the way to…

LNG stands for Liquefied Natural Gas and refers to natural gas that liquefies as it deep-cools to -162 °C and thereby shrinks to 1/600 of…

more
Created by Patrick Dyrba, M. Sc. | 11/27/2021

Competence and competencies in explosion protection

The field of explosion protection requires people who are able to respond competently, i.e. by choosing the correct course of action, in…

more
Created by Martin Thedens (PTB), Tim Krause (PTB), Otto Walch (R. STAHL) | 11/25/2021

Ex-News

Ex standards are created in the IEC TC 31 by the responsible committees. These are given to the national mirror committees to be handled.

more
Created by R. STAHL TRANBERG | 11/23/2021

R. STAHL TRANBERG plays crucial role in world's first autonomous…

[Translate to Englisch:]

Remote control monitoring capabilities, situational awareness and resilience of R.STAHL TRANBERG’s navigation and search lighting key to…

more
Created by Gerold Klotz-Engmann (Endress+Hauser Deutschland) | 10/01/2021

The digital type plate in the era of Industry 4.0

[Translate to Englisch:]

A type plate contains essential information about a product, such as the manufacturer, product name and type, serial number and year of…

more

Page 1 of 2.

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
© R. STAHL AG
  • Start
  • Imprint
  • Privacy Policy
  • r-stahl.com
Use of Cookies

This website uses Cookies that are necessary for the technical operation of the website and are always set. Other Cookies, to personalise content and advertisements and to analyse the access to our website, are only set with your consent. We also share information about your use of our website with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Further information

Necessary Cookies

NamePurposeLifetimeTypeProvider
CookieConsent Saves your consent to using cookies. 1 year HTML Website
fe_typo_user Assigns your browser to a session on the server. session HTTP Website

Analytics Cookies

NamePurposeLifetimeTypeProvider
_ga Used to distinguish users. 2 years HTML Google
_gat Used to throttle request rate. 1 day HTML Google
_gid Used to distinguish users. 1 day HTML Google